Banazir has done it again! She's continuously trying to win West's trust by any means necessary. Her idea of a leadership is pretty obvious by just looking at what she has to say about the issues regarding Pakistan. One day, she's ready to compromise the whole atomic program, and the next she's accepting that America can attack/interfere Pakistan to look for Osama.
The lady's clearly lustful for power and she will go to any extents to get it by hook or by crook! She has never cared about Pakistan or the people here. She'd rather make as much money as she can in her reign and then flee Pakistan as soon as she's not in power anymore. Throughout the history, she's been compromising over Pakistan's integrity and recognition as a country. In the past, she's done everything in her power to make sure that she keeps the higher external influential lords happy to ensure her continued rule as a premier.
Just because of her unholy union with the Dictator, Pakistan is about to be 'blessed' by a leader who's already talking about Pakistan's internal security and integrity as a free nation to be violated by America! This is the strength of her words and the promise she's bringing with her. And again, it amazes me to see that Pakistani people are to play no role absolutely in her forced, undesired and unapproved induction as a Pakistani premier.
America, UK and the remaining West need to evaluate who's promoting terrorists and giving them refuge. UK has recently knighted Salman Rashdi - a person who's written extremely humiliating and degrading texts on the Prophet of Isman (PBUH), and UK has given refuge to MQM leader Altaf Hussain who's wanted for uncountable murders and is involved in numerous terrorism acts in Pakistan. America happens to be the only nation ever to have used atom bomb in warfare and whatnot. Talking about America seems like a cliché now - everyone knows everything about the great USA. Such is the purity of the pious and virtuous nations, and such is the honesty of their intentions. Who decides who is terrorist and who is just a refuge? Who decides who are freedom fighters, and who are a rebel militia? Who decides what to promote and what to ignore? Who decides all this? The brilliant first world nations with wealth decide all these things according to their interests. It is always about the money in the end, and nothing more. Such are the ethics and principles being preached by the 'promoters of peace' and the 'fighters against terrorism'.
So-called leaders like Benazir have sold their souls to the devil, and would always be a puppet in the external powers as they always have been. Let history speak for itself.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment